Legal Opinion

SCHENCK v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00164Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JUSTIN SCHENCK, ) Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-164 ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly ° ; Re: ECF No. 80 CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION, ) Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This is a proposed class action brought pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act,

15 U.S.C. § 1681

(““FCRA”). Plaintiff Justin Schenck (“Schenck”) alleges that Defendant Curtiss-Wright Corporation (“Curtiss-Wright”) violated the FCRA by failing to provide candidates for employment with copies of their background reports and a written summary of FCRA…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Robert Stewart v. Lynne AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API