Legal Opinion

Eggert v. Reed

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John R. Tenney, J.

Plaintiff was employed by the New York Telephone Company. The codefendant, Reed, is a company management employee in the benefits area which maintained a "Management Income Protection Plan” (MIPP) designed to provide certain benefits to employees who have, or may soon become "surplus”. The employee can either accept the MIPP "separation package” voluntarily or take the chance that if his job is terminated, he will only receive the "routine” severance package.

Plaintiff and certain coemployees were declared "surplus” and were given the MIPP option with a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Bergamini v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API