Legal Opinion
United States v. Antonio Andrew Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 2003No. 01-50006PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal assigns as error the district court’s conclusion that the restriction in U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13 precluded a downward departure despite the existence of the extraordinary circumstances surrounding the defendant’s mental condition. Because the district court properly interpreted the sentencing guidelines, we AFFIRM.
BACKGROUND
Antonio Andrew Smith (“Smith”) pled guilty to unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). In its Pre-sentence Report (“PSR”), the United States Probation Office (“Probation”) calculated Smith’s total offense level at 21, with a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Jose Garza CantuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. ThamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Carl Bradley JohanssonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Rosen, Michael. Appeal of Michael G. RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Dorothy MenyweatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Dorothy MenyweatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Chang Guo You, United States of America v. Mi Ae Yim, AKA Mi Ae PigmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Kelly M. CloughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.