Legal Opinion · Dissent

N.Y. Life Insurance Co. v. Weiss

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 18, 1943Published

1Dissent

The decree, in my opinion, nullifies appellants' basic contractual rights. It canceled a "contract for reinstatement" of the policy upon the ground that it had been procured by a fraudulent misrepresentation of a material fact, in that the insured, in failing to disclose the attendance of a physician (Dr. Emery Krausz) in June, 1937, "did not truthfully answer" one of the inquiries put to him by the insurer, and thus "was guilty of equitable fraud," if not conscious fraud.

At the time of the issuance of the policy, the insured was forty-seven years of age. There is no contention that there was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. . Postal Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Froehler v. North American Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Leonard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Officer v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. New York Life Insurance v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API