Huizar v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAL, Justice.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of the offense of murder. The trial court assessed punishment at five (5) years’ confinement.
On original submission, this court held that the charge to the jury constituted reversible error because it failed to require the negation of sudden passion arising from adequate cause even though no objec tion was lodged on this ground at trial. On the State’s petition for discretionary review, this cause was remanded to us for further proceedings consistent with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion in Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Beggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Hobson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Lamb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Valentine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Darty v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- Gant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- McDonald v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- Milner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.