Legal Opinion

Clymer v. Zane

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1934No. 24586PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkin, J.

The first and controlling question is whether the work done by the plaintiffs was within the purview of the statutes providing for minimum wages.

Section 17-3, General Code, provides:

“The term ‘public improvement’, as used in this act, shall include all buildings, roads, streets, alleys, sewers, ditches, sewage disposal plants, water works, and all other structures or works constructed by the state of Ohio or any political subdivision thereof.”

Section 17-4 provides:

“Any public authority authorized to contract for a public improvement may, before advertising for bids for the construction…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ice & Fuel Co. v. KreuzweiserOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Schorr v. VinerOhio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local Union No. 33 v. Gene's Refrigeration, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dean v. Seco Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Callaway v. N. B. Downing Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Wadsworth v. DambachOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API