Legal Opinion

Schuman, Kane, Felts & Everngam v. Aluisi

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 28, 1995No. 34PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

We are required, in this case, to determine whether Maryland Code (1974, 1995 Repl.Vol.) § 7-402(d) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article,1 relating to the refund of certain sheriffs fees, requires that the fee collected for issuance and execution of a warrant of restitution be refunded when the warrant is not executed, either because the tenant has vacated the premises or is no longer in default.

I

Schuman, Kane, Felts & Everngam, Chartered, the appellant, is a law firm which frequently advances, on behalf of its clients, the fees required to be collected by the sheriff in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Adamson v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery County Lodge No. 35 v. MehrlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API