Legal Opinion

Pitts v. First State Bank of Caddo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1964No. 40281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Vice Chief Justice.

Billy Pitts and J. W. Pitts, plaintiffs below, brought this action against The First State Bank of Caddo, Oklahoma, a corporation, and William Lewis (Bill) Young, defendants, to recover the sum of $4,680, because of the alleged raising and altering of plaintiffs’ check from $520 to $5,200. When the action was commenced Billy Pitts was sole plaintiff, but at trial the petition was amended to join J. W. Pitts as a party plaintiff. This amendment alleged “that the money in the bank account of Billy Pitts at The First State Bank of Caddo was really the money of J. W.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Cushing v. KetchumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Rice v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Arrington v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. KeeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Weiner v. Chase National BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kerr-McGee Corp. v. CutterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. SeelkeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Cahill v. WaughCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Cahill v. WaughCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API