Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aquavella v. Viola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2010Published

1Dissent

Scudder, P.J., and Peradotto, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent because we agree with plaintiffs that the signed and unsigned writings admitted in evidence at trial are sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds (see General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [1]).

Plaintiff James V Aquavella, M.D. is an ophthalmologist who established a medical practice (practice) in Rochester in the 1980s. He is also the sole shareholder and director of plaintiff James V Aquavella, M.D., P.C. (Aquavella, P.C.). In the mid-1990s, Aquavella sold the assets of the practice to EquiMed, formerly known as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Morris Cohon & Co. v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Steinberg v. Universal Machinenfabrik GMBHNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Weiner & Co. v. TeitelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Kastner v. GoverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API