Legal Opinion
Opinion No. (2003)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided June 3, 2003Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dear District Attorney Virginia D. Sanders
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:
1. Is it lawful for the terms and conditions of a judgment and sentence to provide that a defendant who meets the statutory requirements for registration under Oklahoma's Sex Offenders Registration Act, 57 O.S. 2001 Supp. 2002, §§ 581-589, is not required to register?
2. Is a judgment and sentence legally enforceable which provides that a defendant who meets the statutory requirements for registration under 57 O.S.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Daniel J. Garrity v. Patrick FiedlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.