Legal Opinion

Barnstead v. Ridder

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 19, 1996No. 94-P-944PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After the allowance of the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration over the plaintiffs’ objection, there were hearings before' the arbitrator, and he rendered his award. The defendant’s motion to confirm the award of the arbitrator was also allowed over the plaintiffs’ objection. The plaintiffs appealed from the order allowing the motion to compel arbitration, the order confirming the award of the arbitrator, the order denying the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the arbitration award, and the ensuing judgment.

*935The relevant facts necessary to this decision are very few. The parties, in an effort…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Plymouth-Carver Regional School District v. J. Farmer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Fay v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Town of Danvers v. Wexler Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Quirk v. Data Terminal Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Pinkis v. Network Cinema Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mugnano-Bornstein v. CrowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Pazol v. Tough Mudder Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. Massachusetts Highway Department v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2001
  4. Arpante v. KavorkianMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  5. C & L Enterprises Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Tribe of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API