Legal Opinion

Carter v. Paige

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1889No. 12637PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

In this cause there were so many motions and proceedings to dismiss the appeal, amend the record, etc., preliminar)7 to the hearing on the merits, and so many printed arguments were filed by counsel," that the court cannot be severely blamed for having *391overlooked one of the additional and supplemental briefs filed on the part of the appellant. When the case was taken up for decision we considered the single point made by appellant in his points and authorities, and pronounced the opinion reported in 20 Pac. Rep. 729. Our attention being called to the fact that we had neglected to notice a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Carter v. PaigeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Luby v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chitty v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Daniel v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Primm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Crews v. MayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API