Legal Opinion

State v. Berg

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1980No. 16548PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Defendant was found guilty under § 58-37 — 8(l)(c) 1 of distribution of a controlled substance. Defendant appeals from the conviction, claiming the court erred in finding that State’s witness Jill Hales was not an accomplice and her testimony did not have to be corroborated. He also contends that application of § 77-31-18, 2 which dispenses with the requirement of corroboration of an accomplice’s testimony and which became effective after the commission of the crime, in this case violates the ex post facto prohibitions of Article I, § 18 of the Utah Constitution and of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KasaiUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. FertigUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. ComishUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. FoustUtah Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wheeler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KerekesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. CelestineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API