Legal Opinion
Drye v. Glatfelter Claims Management, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 27, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00943Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 ROBERT DRYE, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00943-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER 9 v. 10 GLATFELTER CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, 11 INC. et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Before the Court is Defendant Glatfelter Claims Management’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 16 No. 9), and the parties’ stipulation for extension of time to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss 17 (ECF No. 12). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the motion to dismiss in part and 18 denies it in part. The Court grants the parties stipulation nunc pro tunc.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.