Legal Opinion

Steingut v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 7, 1947No. 177-179, Docket 20262-20264PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The facts are amply stated in the very able opinion of Judge Rifkind, D.C., 58 F. Supp. 623. We agree with that opinion.

We do not, however, entirely agree with the trial judge with respect to the interest. See D.C., 60 F.Supp. 103. He held that interest on the deposits should be computed at the contracted rates up to June 16, 1933, the effective date of the Banking Act of 1933, § 11(b), 12 U.S.C.A. § 371a, prohibiting the payment of interest on demand deposits by member banks of the Federal Reserve System; and that interest, after the date when the actions were commenced,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vandervelde v. Put and Call Brokers and Dealers Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  2. Carl Marks & Co. v. Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Theodore Purdy v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Markakis v. The S.S. Mparmpa ChristosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. United States v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API