Legal Opinion
Sklar v. Oil Incomes, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1943No. 10477PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Alleging that he was a person who had furnished a drilling rig for the drilling of an oil well on a lease belonging to the defendants, plaintiff sued under Act 1934, No. 145, § 11 to establish and foreclose on the well, the lease, and appurtenances, appliances etc. thereon, a lien for $42,000.-00, the unpaid purchase price of the rig. Defendants, pointing out that the rig had not been furnished to them, but had been sold to a contractor who, under contract for a turn key job, had drilled a well on their premises with it, and that the rig had not become attached to or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Rester v. Moody & StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Red River Const. Co. v. Pierce Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Bridgeport Machine Co. v. McKnabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Guichard Drilling Co. v. Alpine Energy Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- C.F. Dahlberg & Co., Inc., D/B/A St. Mary Galvanizing Corp., Plaintiff v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Oil Well Supply Co. v. Independent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Ogden Oil Co. v. Servco, a Div. of Smith Intern.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1985
- JHJ Ltd. I v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1983