Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
138 P.3d 723 (2006)
William D. FEARNOW and Elizabeth Fearnow, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
RIDENOUR, SWENSON, CLEERE & EVANS, P.C., Defendants-Appellants.
No. CV-05-0217-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
July 18, 2006.
Paul G. Ulrich P.C. by Paul G. Ulrich, Pamela B. Petersen, Phoenix, Attorneys for William D. and Elizabeth Fearnow.
Osborn Maledon P.A. by Mark I. Harrison, Thomas L. Hudson, Diane M. Meyers, Phoenix, Attorneys for Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C.
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
¶ 1 Ethical Rule ("ER") 5.6(a) of the Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits an "agreement that…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.