Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1978No. 188PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the lower court erred when it: (1) did not dismiss the criminal charges against him, based upon a violation of Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100; (2) did not arrest judgment on the charge of possession of a screwdriver as an instrument of crime, due to insufficient evidence, and (3) convicted and sentenced him for two inchoate crimes, in violation of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 906. Because we agree that the lower court illegally sentenced appellant, we vacate the judgments of sentence and remand for resentencing.

On September 9, 1975, Philadelphia police arrested appellant and filed a written…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. CrockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. HermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. TingleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. DankoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. Von AczelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API