Commonwealth v. Herman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Price, J.,
The only issue in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth presented sufficient evidence to convict appellant of the crimes of attempt with intent to commit a burglary and the possession of burglary tools.
On May 31, 1972, during the early morning hours, Kenneth Gosnell, who resides at 668 West Market Street, upon hearing a “prying” sound from outside, observed from a fourth floor window two men behaving suspiciously at a door leading into Rehmeyer’s store on South Belvidere Avenue in the City of York. Gos-nell summoned his wife, who confirmed her husband’s observations, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. CimaszewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. FinnieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ContiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BadmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- De Salle v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.