Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Laurier Mining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1919No. 15006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Ferry county, Neal, J., entered November 9,1917, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought to recover an undivided one-quarter interest in two mining claims owned by the Laurier Mining Company. The plaintiff alleged- that he is the owner of the one-quarter interest by reason of a trust agreement which was entered into between the defendant Stewart and himself. The defendants denied any trust agreement, and alleged that the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations, and that plaintiff was also barred by reason of laches. Upon a trial of these issues to the court without a jury, the trial court was of the opinion that the plaintiff was guilty of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Ferrell v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Cunningham v. Independence Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKnight v. BasilidesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Nugget Properties, Inc. v. County of KittitasWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Meyer v. TrantumWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API