Legal Opinion

Lingler v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1994No. 55A01-9311-PC-358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

NAJAM, Judge.

In his petition for rehearing, Lingler asserts that we erred in our opinion when we relied upon Jackson v. State (1991), Ind., 575 N.E.2d 617, and found no error in the attempted murder instruction given at his trial. See Lingler v. State (1994), Ind.App., 635 N.E.2d 1102, 1105. Neither Lingler nor the State cited Jackson in their original briefs on appeal. However, Lingler now contends that Jackson does not stand for the proposition that an instruction which informs the jury that the defendant was “attempting to kill” the victim is sufficient to inform the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Spradlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Woodcox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Moore v. ParkeDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
  3. David M. Green v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API