Legal Opinion

Jeffrey v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ingham; Person, J. Case by Alexander J effrey against the Detroit, Lansing ■& Northern Railroad Company for personal injuries. Prom a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant owns and operates a railroad which crosses Larch street, in the city of Lansing, upon a curve, one rail being some inches higher than the other. A sidewalk has crossed said track for many years, and the defendant has been accustomed to keep it in repair. Between the rails, planks, laid upon the ties and *222flush with the top of the rails, constituted a portion of the walk built and maintained by defendant shortly before the accident complained of. The defendant’s servants removed from between the rails the two planks lying nearest to the higher rail. The ground was soon after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maltby v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. Detroit & Northwestern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Logan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Attorney General v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. ElcoMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Township of Burdell v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API