Legal Opinion

Hackensack Trust Co. v. Van Den Berg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 18, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court, Bergen Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

In a suit against the administratrix-respondent founded on a damage claim against her intestate, the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that such claim had not been presented in writing under oath, pursuant to an order limiting creditors (Orphans’ Court act, section 67), and was barred bjr a later order entered as provided by section 70. Of the efficacy of the bar, if the claim was within the purview of the statute, there can be no doubt. Ray Estate Corporation v. Steelman, 90 N. J. L. 184.

The plaintiff appeals…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Saving Fund Society v. DisstonPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1937
  2. Hess v. BugbeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Pitale v. Leroy Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Pinson v. AbbottDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1950
  5. Forwood v. ESTATE OF DAVID W. GREENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API