Mountain Ice Co. v. Durkin

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court, reported in 6 N. J. Mis. R, 1111.

Although in the Supreme Court the question was raised that Margaret Durkin in her petition included the names of three dependent infant children, and defendant contends that as the judgment awarded them compensation, and that as they were not parties to the proceeding either individually or by guardian, guardian ad litem, or next friend, as required by the statute, the judgment in favor of the infants was void; and that the Supreme Court did not…