Legal Opinion

MacKo v. Herbert Hinchman & Son

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 8, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

24 N.J. Super. 304 (1953)

94 A.2d 690

EMIL MACKO, SR., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

HERBERT HINCHMAN & SON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 1, 1952.

Decided January 8, 1953.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and JAYNE.

Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Andrew Mainardi, attorney).

Mr. Lewis P. Dolan argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Dolan and Dolan, attorneys; Mr. William Martin Cox, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

This is a workmen's compensation appeal. The respondent sells…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Terlecki v. StraussSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  4. Sullivan v. Suffolk Peanut Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Zabriskie v. Erie R. R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hake v. Manchester TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Crotty v. Driver Harris Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Olivera v. Hatco Chemical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Crotty v. Driver-Harris Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Greenfarb v. ArreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API