Legal Opinion

Biziko v. Van Horne

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 20, 2019No. 1:16-cv-00111Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT “E25 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS . ABILENE DIVISION rts AUG 20 PH 4: 30 AMBER BIZIKO, § SePuTY con Plaintiff, § v. § No. 1:16-CV-0111-BP STEVEN VAN HORNE, et al., : Defendants. : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 74) and Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 75). Each party has filed a re- sponse in opposition, see Defs.’ Resp. (ECF No. 78) and Pl.’s Resp. (ECF No. 79), and a reply brief, see Pl.’s Reply (ECF No. 80) and Defs.’ Reply (ECF No. 81). The parties have…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API