Biziko v. Van Horne
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT “E25 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS . ABILENE DIVISION rts AUG 20 PH 4: 30 AMBER BIZIKO, § SePuTY con Plaintiff, § v. § No. 1:16-CV-0111-BP STEVEN VAN HORNE, et al., : Defendants. : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 74) and Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 75). Each party has filed a re- sponse in opposition, see Defs.’ Resp. (ECF No. 78) and Pl.’s Resp. (ECF No. 79), and a reply brief, see Pl.’s Reply (ECF No. 80) and Defs.’ Reply (ECF No. 81). The parties have…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.