Orick v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentMcG-owen, J.
For the reason that I cannot bring myself to the conclusion reached by the majority of my brethren, I dissent in this case, and shall briefly set forth my reasons for so doing.
The majority opinion declares section 3, chapter 244, Acts of 1924, making competent the testimony of any lawful officer, and permitting the introduction as evidence of any intoxicating liquors or any still or appliances used in the manufacture or transportation of intoxicating liquors, in the trial of any criminál case involving the prohibition laws of this state,' whether procured by such officer by virtue of a search…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. TonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Tucker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.