Legal Opinion

Maslia v. DiMauro

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1974No. 28945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Justice.

The discretion of the trial judge in refusing to consolidate cases will not be disturbed unless there is a very plain case of abuse of discretion to the detriment of the movant. Under the circumstances showing the character of the cases which the court refused to consolidate, upon which ruling, error was assigned, even if the judge would have been authorized to consolidate the cases, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to do so. Railroad Comm. of Ga. v. Southern R. Co., 154 Ga. 297 (1) (114 SE 335); Sanders v. Wilson, 193 Ga. 393, 397 (18 SE2d 765).

Submitted June…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanders v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Railroad Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colodny v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Wilson v. SermonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Vaughan v. DukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Bernath v. MalloySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Department of Transportation v. DefoorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API