Department of Transportation v. Defoor
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge
I agree that the trial judge had authority under OCGA § 32-3-17.1 to consolidate the cases for trial despite the consent nominally required by OCGA § 9-11-42 (a), and that the trial court did not abuse the discretion vested in it by OCGA § 32-3-17.1. However, I disagree that the two code sections are in conflict. Upon an application of the rule which requires that statutes be construed if possible so as to find no conflict and give application to both, I find that one is *221not abrasive of the other. Central of Ga. R. Co. v. State of Ga., 104 Ga. 831, 842 (2) (31 SE 531) (1898); McPherson v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- City of Atlanta v. First National Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Wheels & Brakes, Inc. v. Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- McPherson v. City of DawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Department of Transportation v. OlshanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.