Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Bachner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1912No. Docket No. 179PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Summary proceedings by William H. Flynn against Nathaniel E. Bachner and another for the possession of leased premises. From a judgment for defendants, complainant appealed to the circuit court which affirmed the order of the commissioner. Complainant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Plaintiff is the owner of a four-story brick building located at 112 Farmer street, Detroit. The lower portion of the building is devoted to stores, one of which was on the 14th day of October, 1907, let to defendants under terms contained in a written lease. The portions of the lease pertinent to this inquiry are as follows:
“ Portion leased: The first floor and rear of the basement as partitioned * * * for the term of three years from and after the first day of November, 1907, with the privilege of two years more at the expiration of said first *425three years, making, if said privilege of two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Stone v. St. Louis Stamping Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- DeFriest v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Kimball v. CrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Stender v. KerreosMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pritchett v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Meadow Heights Country Club v. HinckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Starr v. HolckMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- American Press Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Plaza North, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.