Leigh v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages claimed to have been occasioned by the defendant’s breach of an alleged agreement to purchase thirty-nine shares of stock. The court rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.
The finding is not subject to correction. The basic facts are as follows: Late in 1947 or early in 1948, the plaintiff became treasurer of the Durable Wire Company, Inc., of Clintonville. He turned over to the corporation $2000 and machinery worth $900, for which he received thirty-nine shares of the common stock. The defendant became president…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shulman v. Hartford Public LibrarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Woodbridge Ice Co. v. Semon Ice Cream CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Molloy v. RourkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Pleines v. Franklin Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Nothnagle v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Shinabarger v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1966
- Dotolo v. PetrucelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.