Legal Opinion

Leigh v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 29, 1952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages claimed to have been occasioned by the defendant’s breach of an alleged agreement to purchase thirty-nine shares of stock. The court rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.

The finding is not subject to correction. The basic facts are as follows: Late in 1947 or early in 1948, the plaintiff became treasurer of the Durable Wire Company, Inc., of Clintonville. He turned over to the corporation $2000 and machinery worth $900, for which he received thirty-nine shares of the common stock. The defendant became president…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shulman v. Hartford Public LibrarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Woodbridge Ice Co. v. Semon Ice Cream CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  3. Molloy v. RourkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Pleines v. Franklin Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Nothnagle v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Shinabarger v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1966
  5. Dotolo v. PetrucelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API