Steele v. Gill
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his cause “for want of prosecution.” 1 Plaintiff prays for relief by mandamus if the judgment will not support an appeal.
It appears that this court has decided that such a judgment will support an appeal and that mandamus to set aside the judgment does not lie.
In an action for breach of a bond, this court said:. . . . This order dismissing for want of prosecution is such a final order or judgment as will support an appeal. . . . .” Ellis & Co. v. Brannon, 161 Ala. 573, 579, 49 So. 1034, 1035.
In denying mandamus to require the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ex Parte Central Alabama Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Ellis & Co. v. BrannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- City of Birmingham v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Ex Parte Lineville Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Bd. of Health v. Greater Birmingham Ass'n of Home Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Scullin v. CameronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- McClellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Arant v. GrierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Hale v. Larry Latham Auctioneers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.