Legal Opinion

Steele v. Gill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 12, 1968No. 1 Div. 388, 400PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his cause “for want of prosecution.” 1 Plaintiff prays for relief by mandamus if the judgment will not support an appeal.

It appears that this court has decided that such a judgment will support an appeal and that mandamus to set aside the judgment does not lie.

In an action for breach of a bond, this court said:. . . . This order dismissing for want of prosecution is such a final order or judgment as will support an appeal. . . . .” Ellis & Co. v. Brannon, 161 Ala. 573, 579, 49 So. 1034, 1035.

In denying mandamus to require the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Ex Parte Central Alabama Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Ellis & Co. v. BrannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. City of Birmingham v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Ex Parte Lineville Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Bd. of Health v. Greater Birmingham Ass'n of Home Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Scullin v. CameronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. McClellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Arant v. GrierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Hale v. Larry Latham Auctioneers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API