Tannehill v. Special Indemnity Fund
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice.
Does a workman with a prior adjudicated non-scheduled permanent partial disability become a “physically impaired person” as defined in 85 O.S.1971, § 171, and qualify as the recipient of the entitlements of the Special Indemnity Fund where he suffers a subsequent adjudicated non-scheduled permanent partial disability and a combination of the two separate non-scheduled (other cases) injuries is less that 100% or total permanent disability? The answer must be in the affirmative. In 1969, petitioner, hereafter claimant, sustained a neck injury which required surgery of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Becknell v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Special Indemnity Fund v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Forston v. HeislerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Special Indemnity Fund v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Lowery v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Milton v. HayesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Threatt v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Mitchell v. CloyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.