Legal Opinion

Tannehill v. Special Indemnity Fund

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1975No. 47562PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice.

Does a workman with a prior adjudicated non-scheduled permanent partial disability become a “physically impaired person” as defined in 85 O.S.1971, § 171, and qualify as the recipient of the entitlements of the Special Indemnity Fund where he suffers a subsequent adjudicated non-scheduled permanent partial disability and a combination of the two separate non-scheduled (other cases) injuries is less that 100% or total permanent disability? The answer must be in the affirmative. In 1969, petitioner, hereafter claimant, sustained a neck injury which required surgery of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Becknell v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Forston v. HeislerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Lowery v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Milton v. HayesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Threatt v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Mitchell v. CloyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API