Legal Opinion

Twohig v. Sweeney

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1986No. A028865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.

Objectors/appellants James Thomas Sweeney and Susan Lorraine Sweeney Jansen appeal an order admitting to probate the unsigned codicil to the will of Thomas J. Twohig. They contend the codicil was neither valid on its face nor integrated with decedent’s formal will. We agree and reverse.

Decedent, an attorney, had four children from his first marriage: Riley, Clare, Sarah, and Brian. This marriage ended in 1958 with the death of his wife. In 1968 he married Lorraine June Twohig, who had two children, appellants herein, from a prior marriage. Appellants lived with their mother…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Crosby v. Crockeranglo National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Goldberg v. BlochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perrin v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Estate of SolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Cox v. TowleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Estate of BodmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API