Legal Opinion

Perrin v. Lee

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 2008No. G038633PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, Acting P. J.

inter vivos trust, amended her trust three times shortly before she died of breast cancer. At the time of her death, her two children, Austin Jisu Perrin and Elissa Ji-Yun Perrin, were only 11 and eight years old, respectively. Dirk Van Tatenhove (Guardian), as their guardian ad litem, filed a Probate Code section 21320 “safe harbor” petition for a determination that his proposed petition to invalidate the second and third trust amendments would not be a contest within the meaning of the no contest clause of the trust. (All subsequent statutory references herein are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Meyer v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. In Re Estate of RossiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Estate of McNamaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fazzi v. KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Aviles v. Swearingen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Cory v. ToscanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Aviles v. SwearingenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Godoy v. LinznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API