Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Ross

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 18, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Ki/ugh, J., Cherokee, October Term, 1905. Action by Armour & Co. against M. b. Ross. cites: As to ratification of acts of agent: 1 Ency.,-2 ed., 1189, 1174; 11 How., 209; 22 Am. Dec., 220. Agent cannot prevent principal from recovering his property by breach of trust: 11 How., 209; 22 Am-. Dec., 220; 48 Am. Dec., 643; 59 Am. Dec., 293; 1 McC., 1; 4 Strob., 427; 10 Rich., 83; 12 Rich., 451. No- citations.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action to> recover the value of goods, alleged ho have been converted by the defendants to their own use. The complaint alleges, that at the time hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiff was the owner of a quantity of bacon and lard, of .the value of $1,353.41. That at said time the property was in possession of the defendant, St. John Butler, as plaintiff’s agent, and -was in his hands upon consignment. That on or about the 20 th of August, 1901, the defendants, knowing that the plaintiff was owner of said property, and, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Akers v. RowanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  2. Hodges v. KohnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  3. Maxwell v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Perkins v. Loan & Exchange BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  5. Gregory v. DuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Armour & Co. v. RossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Atlantic & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co. v. Victor Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Goodwin v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Tyson v. National Discount Corp.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API