Legal Opinion

Harris v. Koenig

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 27, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2002-0618Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ WILLIAM S. HARRIS, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 02-618 (GK) ) JAMES E. KOENIG, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION The Waste Management Defendants1 have filed, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (Defs.’ Mot.) (March 30, 2011) [Dkt. No. 444], a Motion to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Saul Solomon Upon consideration of the Motion, the Opposition, the Reply, and the applicable case law, the Court concludes that the Motion will be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Teresa Ambrosini v. Jorge Labarraque and the Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Graden v. Conexant Systems Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API