Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
Plaintiff, an employee of the Southern Kraft Corporation, was insured under a group accidental dea^h and dismemberment policy issued by defendant to said employer, which provides fpr the payment -to plaintiff of a definite sum of money in the event he should suffer, in the manner and as described in the policy: “The loss of one hand by severance at or above wrist joint; or loss of one foot by severance at. or above ankle-joint; or total and irrecoverable loss of sight of one eye.”
According to the allegations of the petition, while said policy was in force, plaintiff while…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sneck v. Travellers' InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Moore v. Ætna Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Beber v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. ShelbyMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- Great Northern Life Ins. v. Tulsa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Jefferson v. Monumental General Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Phoenix Indemnity Company and Joseph Jurisich Marine Service, Inc. v. Marquette Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Smith v. East West Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Barge & Ship Service, Inc. v. River Fleets, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.