Legal Opinion

Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1939No. 5926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff, an employee of the Southern Kraft Corporation, was insured under a group accidental dea^h and dismemberment policy issued by defendant to said employer, which provides fpr the payment -to plaintiff of a definite sum of money in the event he should suffer, in the manner and as described in the policy: “The loss of one hand by severance at or above wrist joint; or loss of one foot by severance at. or above ankle-joint; or total and irrecoverable loss of sight of one eye.”

According to the allegations of the petition, while said policy was in force, plaintiff while…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sneck v. Travellers' InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Moore v. Ætna Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Beber v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. ShelbyMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Great Northern Life Ins. v. Tulsa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Jefferson v. Monumental General Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Phoenix Indemnity Company and Joseph Jurisich Marine Service, Inc. v. Marquette Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Smith v. East West Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Barge & Ship Service, Inc. v. River Fleets, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API