Denike v. De Graaf
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Westchester county. Action by Charles W. Denike against Henry P. De Graaf to recover damages for deceit • From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCullen, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the verdict of the jury at circuit, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The action is to recover damages for deceit in the contract for the exchange of lands. The complaint alleges that one Burnham, acting for the plaintiff, entered into an agreement with the defendant under their hands and seals for the exchange of certain lands, and that the plaintiff was induced to enter into such contract and carry it out by the false representation of the defendant that the land he agreed to convey had cost…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Briggs v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Schaefer v. . HenkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Squier v. NorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elliott v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Peterson v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Blanchard v. ArcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Baldwin v. Wanagru Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Elliott v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.