Legal Opinion

Clay v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1994No. CR 93-1230PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant Marcus Clay was charged with committing five sex offenses against five different victims at different locations over a one-year period. There was no allegation, and there was no proof at the preliminary hearing, that the five offenses were planned in advance as part of a single scheme. Appellant was seventeen years old when most of the crimes were committed and was eighteen years old when the case was tried. The victims were three to five years younger than he. The trial court ordered all five charges consolidated for trial and refused appellant’s motion to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Harold S. Cross v. United States of America, John L. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. Free v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Passley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Munson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Short v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Lindsey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API