Legal Opinion

Pedro Pablo Hidalgo-Disla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 12, 1995No. Docket 94-4179PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge:

This motion prompts us to consider the circumstances under which an appeal may be dismissed as frivolous without benefit of full briefing and argument.

Petitioner Pedro Pablo Hidalgo-Disla, a 54r-year-old native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, moves pro se for leave to proceed informa pauperis on his petition before this Court. The petition seeks review of the September 12, 1994 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirms the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) finding Hidalgo-Disla deportable. The IJ denied him discretionary relief under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Carl D. Potnick v. Eastern State Hospital, Carl D. Potnick v. Suffolk PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Rafael Montilla v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barco-Sandoval v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Jean Patrick Michel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Leslie Thomas Leonard v. Peter J. Lacy, Superintendent, Bare Hill Facility, and Myaddow, Correctional OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Alvarez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  5. Barco-Sandoval v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API