Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. Glickman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1998No. 19-51014PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
This is the latest in a series of cases brought by Sierra Club and others concerned about endangered species that depend on water from the Edwards Aquifer for their survival. The appellants, Dan Gliekman, the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, and the United States Department of Agriculture (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “USDA”), appeal from a judgment entered against them on all three counts of the appellees’ complaint. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and dismiss the remainder of the appeal as moot.
I.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Iowa League of Cities v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Goldin v. BartholowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Cox v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.