State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Old Fort Finishing Plant
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The first question confronting us is whether this Court has jurisdiction to review decisions of the Utilities Commission on direct appeal “without intermediate review in the superior court.” Western contends G.S. 62-99, which purports to authorize such direct appeal and review, is in conflict with Article IV of the Constitution of North Carolina, as amended by the voters in the General Election held November 6, 1962, specifically Sections 2, 3, 5 and 10 thereof.
The General Assembly, by enactment of Chapter 1165, Session Laws of 1963, “Amended, revised, and recodified” Chapters 56, 60 and 62…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- In Re ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission v. Cannon Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Taylor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Jones v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 44, MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Employment Security Commission v. PeaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.