Legal Opinion

Daddono v. Miele

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 2011No. Nos. 4D10-19, 4D10-534PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.

This appeal arises out of a jury award in favor of Fred Burdett on behalf of Forte Equity, Inc. (“Forte”) and against Domenic Miele on Forte’s claim for breach of fiduciary duty. Miele sought and was awarded a set-off against the amount of damages suffered by Forte. After the trial, the trial court awarded Miele prejudgment interest on the full set-off amount and awarded Forte its attorney’s fees. Forte appeals the trial court’s award of prejudgment interest and Miele cross-appeals the attorney’s fee award in favor of Forte. We reverse the trial court’s award of prejudgment interest on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anglia Jacs & Co., Inc. v. DubinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. FA Chastain Construction, Inc. v. PrattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Brewer v. Clerk of Circuit CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Gibbs Const. Co. v. SL Page Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Caplan v. 1616 East Sunrise Motors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. US Acquisition, LLC v. Tabas, Freedman, Soloff, Miller & Brown, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. BogorffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API