Legal Opinion

Radach v. Gunderson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 2, 1985No. 6463-4-IIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.

— Ole and Barbara Gunderson decided to build a house on their ocean-front lot in the city of Ocean Shores. They contracted the job to David Bickmore. Bick-more mistakenly placed the house 10 feet closer to the ocean-front property line than permitted by the City's zoning code. Eugene and Adriana Radach, neighbors two lots away, complained to the City from almost the beginning, but the City did nothing and the house was completed. The Radachs brought action against the Gun-dersons and the City for injunctive relief. The Gundersons cross-claimed for indemnity against the City and Bickmore.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. J & B Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Thomas v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Eastlake Community Council v. Roanoke Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sabey v. Howard Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Sabey v. Howard Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. SKAMANIA CTY. v. Columbia River Gorge Com'nWashington Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API