Legal Opinion
Walter W. Johnson Company, a Corporation v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1956No. 14122_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
On June 28, 1949, in the District Court for the Northern District of California, appellee, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, an agency of the United States, brought an action against Tuolumne Gold Dredging Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, hereafter called Tuolumne, and others. One of Tuolumne’s codefendants was appellant, Walter W. Johnson Company, a Nevada corporation.
The complaint was in two counts. 1 Appellant filed an answer containing five counterclaims. 2 Appellee filed a reply 3 and an amended reply. 4 Thereafter, on October 7, 1952, pursuant to Rule 33 of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walter W. Johnson Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Tuolumne Gold Dredging Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Santos v. District Council of New York CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Frank Santos v. District Council Of New York City And Vicinity Of United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Tom Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- Matthew v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979