Legal Opinion

Matthew v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 24, 1979No. 78 Civ. 0047 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Matthew has brought this derivative action against the Negro Economic Development Corporation Fund, Inc. (“NEDCF”), the National Business League (“NBL”), the United States of America (the “government”), the Economic Development Administration (“EDA”) and the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) (the government, the EDA and the SBA collectively the “federal defendants.”). The action stems from an alleged breach of an amendment (the “amendment”) to a technical assistance grant given by the government, acting through the EDA, to the NBL. The amendment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by William Sheppard, Insurance Commissioner v. National Association of Flood Insurers, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. American Science and Engineering, Inc. v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. Laura Hebah, Administratrix, in the Matter of the Estate of Robert Hebah, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jemo Associates, Inc. v. Greene Metropolitan Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API