Legal Opinion

Panasonic Communications Corporation of America v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 14, 2013No. 09-793TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Exeise Tax; Ozone-Depleting Chemicals; Expert Discovery; “Additional Data” in Expert Rebuttal Report; Denial of Sur-Rebuttal

ORDER

EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge.

On December 18, 2012, Defendant filed two motions relating to expert discovery. In the first motion, Defendant seeks leave to file a “supplementary rebuttal” report of testing it would like to' conduct “to address the opinions of plaintiffs proposed expert that are based on his belated testing” as reported in Plaintiffs rebuttal report filed on December 3, 2012. In the alternative, Defendant requests that “all opinions by plaintiffs proposed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChaitDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  2. Beller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2003
  3. Deseret Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alta Wind I Owner Lessor C v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API