Panasonic Communications Corporation of America v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Exeise Tax; Ozone-Depleting Chemicals; Expert Discovery; “Additional Data” in Expert Rebuttal Report; Denial of Sur-Rebuttal
ORDER
EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge.
On December 18, 2012, Defendant filed two motions relating to expert discovery. In the first motion, Defendant seeks leave to file a “supplementary rebuttal” report of testing it would like to' conduct “to address the opinions of plaintiffs proposed expert that are based on his belated testing” as reported in Plaintiffs rebuttal report filed on December 3, 2012. In the alternative, Defendant requests that “all opinions by plaintiffs proposed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crowley v. ChaitDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Beller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2003
- Deseret Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alta Wind I Owner Lessor C v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018