Legal Opinion

City of Mobile v. Aborady

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1992No. 1910464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The City of Mobile appeals from a judgment declaring Mobile's annexation of adjacent unincorporated territory void. A number of residents of that territory had challenged the annexation on the ground that the act providing for a referendum on the annexation was not passed in accordance with Ala. Const., Art. IV, § 106, and Ala. Code 1975, § 11-42-6.1 The issue is whether an amendment decreasing the area of the territory to be annexed changed the substance of the bill from the bill as it was advertised and thereby violated § 106.

In February and March 1990, two proposed annexation bills were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. WoolfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. First Nat. Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Mayor of Ensley v. CohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Deputy Sheriffs Law Enforc. v. Mobile Cty.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. KampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. City of Tuscaloosa v. KampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API