Legal Opinion

Lipocine Inc. v. Clarus Therapeutics, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 18, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00622Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LIPOCINE INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 19-622 (WCB) CLARUS THERAPEUTICS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Clarus Therapeutics, Inc., has filed a motion for leave to file a Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims (“Second Amended Answer”). Dkt. No 145. In turn, plaintiff Lipocine Inc. has filed a motion to strike portions of Clarus’s final invalidity contentions and expert reports regarding inequitable conduct, patent misuse, and indefiniteness. Dkt. No. 148. The parties presented oral…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API